Battery-powered watches that relied on quartz crystals to keep time were far more accurate than traditional mechanical watches. As a result of the Quartz Revolution, the digital watch became a phenomenon in the s watches were so cheap, you could buy them for a few dollars.
This represented a major disruption to the watchmaking industry, but by the end of the 80s, equilibrium had more or less been reestablished and Swiss-made mechanical watches were hot again. Digital watches were often boxy and, at times, ugly. Mechanical watches came out the other side of the Quartz Revolution more sophisticated and, comparatively, more fashionable than ever.
This was in no small part due to the rise of the cellular phone. The technological history of the first two decades of the 21 st century is centered around the mobile phone.
Apple understood that to make its products vital, the design and technology required equal consideration. With mobile phones becoming not just widely popular but essential to daily life, everyone had a clock in their pockets at all times. It was a minor function of a technology that could play music, videos, and video games, but it undermined the main function of the watch.
The mobile phone had seemingly made the wristwatch obsolete. As a result, every few years, a slew of articles appears proclaiming the end of watches among other technologies. And yet, the wristwatch is still here, and by some metrics, the industry is as healthy as ever. For every article about the death of the watch, like clockwork, another article appears announcing that wristwatches are making a comeback.
It can be hard to keep up with the prognostications. From week to week, wristwatches are either dying or living their best life. By all accounts, wristwatches absolutely should be dying out. Even the extra features that watches gained in the 20 th century like altimeters, tachymeters, compasses, calculators, and thermometers, just to name a few have been replicated on mobile phones, often with greater accuracy.
One way that the wristwatch has managed to remain relevant in our modern times is by embracing the future. Thus arrived the smartwatch. Smartwatches come in many different forms and styles, but the basic definition is a touchscreen-activated wearable timepiece.
There have been watches with sound recorders, video displays, phone calling capabilities, and other attributes common in smartphones. Arguably, though, the first true smartwatch was the appropriately named Sony SmartWatch. It was designed to link to the Xperia smartphone and ran a type of Android operating system. Alas, being first rarely means being best, especially in the tech world. Instead, the biggest step forward for the smartwatch came from one of the usual suspects: Apple.
The Apple Watch, released in , was the first Apple innovation to be released after the death of Steve Jobs. It was designed to augment the iPhone, not to replace smartphones, which, it should be noted, Apple is still very much in the business of selling. Whereas smartphones have infested every aspect of our lives, the Apple Watch allows connectivity without obsessive devotion. It gives me visual reassurance that time with apologies to Einstein is passing in measurable, orderly and linear fashion.
It shows that there is a past, a present and a future. What do I do with the watches I bring back to life? Mostly, I give them away to friends and family, including the grandsons, grand-nieces and -nephews. The girls like them because they are pretty; girls and boys, because having a watch is a sign that they are growing up.
At least, it used to mean that. Or is that a little too Freudian? Clair Township Trustees, community centr, 4 p. East Liverpool Orders due by noon for Boardman United Methodist Church, Market Finally, watch wearers behave in a way that is consistent with higher levels of conscientiousness by arriving at an appointment earlier than non-watch wearers.
The investigators are also careful to point out that it remains unclear whether wristwatch wearers are more conscientious to begin with, or if the character trait is actually enhanced by wearing a watch correlation does not necessarily imply causation.
They note, "The standard watch remains technologically simple, but this simplicity explains why countless manufactures of smartwatches are attempting to capitalize on this specific form factor. Such devices typically measure and provide additional feedback related to physical and physiological activity e. Interestingly, these devices are more likely to be purchased by those who already lead a healthy lifestyle.
The desire to own or wear a standard wristwatch may therefore be driven by higher levels of conscientiousness in the first instance. Alternatively, the decision to purchase a watch may simply be motivated by a desire to know the time, become more organised and in turn attempt to become more conscientious.
They also make the interesting point that a smartphone is not a substitute for a watch, in terms of how we perceive time and how that perception affects punctuality. They also arrive earlier for appointments.
From the present data, it is not clear whether being conscientious inclines a person to wear a watch, or whether wearing a watch makes a person more conscientious.
0コメント