Socrates said that having a mechanical life with an unthinking routine, under the rules of others without ever examining whether or not they truly want to live with those routines or rules is basically not worth living anymore. De Montaigne had quite the opposite approach on how to live a happy life to Socrates. Socrates believed over analysing and examining our lives would lead to better ones, whereas De Montaigne would advise us to spend less time over-analysing and overthinking things as it leads to insecurities that we are all far better off without.
We must occasionally question ourselves and the world, as otherwise we will act without reason, and be unable to distinguish between good or bad actions, and without this way of thinking Socrates might argue we are no better off than animals. Socrates seemed to overlook other factors that account to our happiness and give worth to our lives. In disagreement with Socrates; We all must contemplate now and again but only to a certain extent, as it can be disastrous to overthink and reconsider every aspect of our life.
If we have helped you, please help us fix his smile with your old essays Matter makes up everything, everywhere. All matter, both living and non-living, is composed of miniature…. Roman citizen Physically fit and 1. Tutor and Freelance Writer. Science Teacher and Lover of Essays.
Article last reviewed: St. One does not negate the other. Clearly this thesis portrays the authors lack of understanding of Socrates. Socrates was arguing that happiness derived from delusion is fleeting, shallow, and worthless. The examples quoted are very good. The explanation and language is well suited for the ethics answers. The balance is perfect and you have covered the necessary elements Write the subheadings in each paragraph. Nice try Neat and clean answer with all the demands of the question Good examples in all parts.
The structure is superb and the presentation excellent. Very good and comprehensive attempt. Close Menu Book Free Counselling. My Courses. IAS Foundation. Mains TS. Prelims TS. Monthly Mags. In the next part explain what do you understand by the quote. This quote deals with the examination of life, i. Introspection helps us in our pursuit of wisdom and search for the truth.
But the quote can also be counter-argued by mentioning that all unexamined lives are not worth living is unreasonable. For many, life in itself is worth living whether it is examined or not. Also mention how the quote applies in the present context in the life of a person in society. Answer Socrates was considered by many to be the wisest man in ancient Greece, his spoken words are still listened to and followed today.
For if we don't think, we are no more than animals, simply eating, sleeping, working and procreating. And though it may be a bit strong to say such lives are not worth living, all but a minority of ethical vegetarians would agree that they are much less valuable than fully human ones. However, there would be no need to exhort us to examine our lives if we did not think that there were human beings who do not, and so have valueless, bestial lives.
The noble ideal has a harsh implication: some in the herd of humankind may as well be animals, or dead. This thought becomes even more chilling when you consider what Plato would consider an examined life to be like. For though almost everyone questions the way they live at some point, it is probably only a minority who subject it to Socratic scrutiny.
0コメント